Wispid

A 38-year old bank employee in Japan was busted for photographing up a woman’s skirt at a book store.

Violating an ordinance that prohibits people from creating a nuisance, the man fixed a camera to his shoe so he could take a shot at whatever was up the skirt of a 31-year old woman at a book store in Takasaki.

What!? Does he think nobody will notice there was a camera on his shoe?

Maybe not…the camera was 1cm (.4″) in diameter and he controlled it remotely through a device in his bag.

“Smile!”

The store manager noticed that something was stupid about his behavior – (trying to get his foot under the woman while rummaging through a handbag can look goofy, I suppose.)

And, I wonder, just how much fun can it be to have an out-of-focused dark picture of somebody’s panties.

Feedback?

A California dude went to jail for eight years for secretly videotaping a woman (45) and a teenage girl (16) in their bedrooms and bathrooms at an apartment complex where he worked.

Through the course of investigating this sex nut, police confiscated some 500 pornographic movies and 250 magazines.

Out early for good behavior the man wants his movies and rags back and is suing the police force.

The man’s lawyer says the materials are unrelated to the peeping case.

Yup…you can always count on a lawyer to be on your side…no matter what side you are on.

The lawyer says the video collection was (key word is was) worth around 4$10K.

Lawyers for the city are asking direction from a judge to determine if it is “lawful or appropriate” to return the stuff to the man who has a 25+ year history as a peeping Tom.

Magazines and movies weren’t enough…he had to have more.

Meanwhile, police are trying to gather all the stuff back up?

Venezuela’s National Electoral Council has laid out a draft that would let authorities turn down names that parents want for their children – Edigaith, Mileidy, Leomar, Superman…

Superman?

Yup, there are two people registered to vote in Caracas with the name Superman.

Registry authorities are permitted to refuse names that would expose children to ridicule….

But, can they teach the parents how to spell? Maikel…Jhonny, Jesshy and so on….

The law would never work in the United States, where I swear (if I were the swearing kind) that some parents pride themselves on coming up with names that have never been seen or heard of….

Alfredo named his kid Phetacheeney…

Bones named their kid Barbq…

The Venezuelans may be able to prevent most stupid names from being applied, but they will NEVER rid the world of stupid parents.

Two thieves swiped a hearse, with corpse inside, and went barhopping.

When the hearse ran out of gas, the two knuckleheads were able to persuade three women to help them push the car to a gas station.

“If you help push, I’ll let you ride in the back with Joe. He’s no trouble, doesn’t drink any and I guarantee he’ll keep his hands of you.”

The women were told that “Joe” was a relative and they were on their way to bury him.

But, the women didn’t buy it….if they were the kind of woman who could be picked up in a bar and persuaded to help push a hearse, they were NOT the kind of women who wanted to be left alone by Joe or anyone else.

Police caught up with the two who admitted they hadn’t dumped the corpse yet because they were yet to decide what to do with the car.

“Gee, it’s hard to figure things out when you are drunk.”

A great candidate for the stupid parent awards is a 27-year old mother who cleaned out her methamphetamine pipe with a cotton swab…then cleaned out her 8-month old infant’s nose…causing the little one to die.

A boyfriend who was there was of no help to either the mother or the baby.

The baby also had a fractured skull, broken arm and pneumonia when he was found.

No matter what she says, those things didn’t happen to the baby by somebody applying a cotton swab.

Can kids have the option to give their parents back?